what did roy moore say about the 17 amendments to the constitution

(CNN)In June 2011, Roy Moore suggested on a radio show that getting rid of constitutional amendments after the 10th would solve many issues in the way the Us regime is structured.

"That would eliminate many issues," Moore said subsequently 1 of the hosts of the "Aroostook Watchmen" suggested it. "You know people don't understand how some of these amendments have completely tried to wreck the form of regime that our forefathers intended."

Roy Moore in 2011: Getting rid of amendments after 10th would 'eliminate many problems'

Moore singled out the 17th Amendment, according to an sound file obtained by CNN's KFile, which calls for the direct ballot of US Senators. (A complaint he mentioned on Lord's day during an unrelated interview ahead of Tuesday'southward special Senate election on Alabama.) He also took issue with the 14th Amendment, which was passed after the Civil War and guarantees citizenship, equal rights and protection under the law to former slaves, claiming it put undue restrictions on us.

    "Once again, the media is taking a word about the overall framework for the separation of powers every bit laid out in the constitution to twist Roy Moore'southward position on specific issues," Moore entrada spokesman Brett Doster told KFile. "Roy Moore does not at present nor has he ever favored limiting an individual'due south right to vote, and as a judge, he was noted for his fairness and for being a champion of ceremonious rights."

      Friday will mark 226 years since the Neb of Rights (the starting time 10 amendments) was ratified. In the meantime, Congress and the states added 17 more, though ane, the 21st, undid another, the 18th. If yous were to wipe them all off the books, the state would be fundamentally changed.

      Here's how:

      Nosotros might have President Donald Trump and Vice President Hillary Clinton

        Uh oh...

        The twelfth amendment (1804) was basically a tune-up to the electoral college, which wasn't originally designed to properly account for political parties (as it related to governing outcomes).

        Ane weird side event: Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson finished second in the 1796 election to the Federalist John Adams. But because of the law so, Jefferson became vice president. The amendment made sure, among other things, that running mates won and lost together.

        (Yes, we skipped the 11th amendment (1795). If you're curious, read all well-nigh information technology right hither.)

        Slavery would not have been outlawed (in 1865)

        The 13th amendment (1865) outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude ("except as a punishment for offense"). The Emancipation Proclamation was nifty, but the end of slavery was definitely something that needed to be in the state'due south most serious writing.

        It was ratified on December 6, 1865, a little more 10 months afterwards it passed in the House of Representatives. The Ceremonious War came to an end about halfway between the two steps. Hither's how The New York Times described the scene in the House:

        "When the presiding officer announced that the resolution was agreed to by yeas 119, nays 56, the enthusiasm of all present, save a few disappointed politicians, knew no bounds, and for several moments the scene was chiliad and impressive across description. No attempt was made to suppress the adulation which came from all sides, every one feeling that the occasion justified the fullest expression of approbation and joy."

        United states could freely brand laws to undo core federal rights

        The 14th subpoena (1868) sets out the fundamental rights of Americans and calls for proportional representation in Congress. (Notation: at the time, much of this merely applied to "male inhabitants.") It also forbade united states of america from making laws that might violate these promises. It played a major role in the Supreme Court's gay union decision.

        Here's the cardinal passage:

        "No state shall brand or enforce whatever law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall whatever state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

        Race could be a legal bar to voting

        The terminal of the Reconstruction amendments, the 15th subpoena (1870) gave all men the correct to vote, notably including all freed slaves:

        "The correct of citizens of the United states to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on business relationship of race, color, or previous status of servitude."

        There'd exist no fight over the Republican revenue enhancement plan...

        ...because there would be no federal income taxes. The 16th subpoena (1913) gave the federal government the right to collect an income revenue enhancement, setting off more than a century of arguments about how it should work, who should pay what and how.

        "The Congress shall have ability to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment amidst the several states and without regard to whatsoever census or enumeration."

        At that place'd be a very unlike fight over who's going to be the adjacent senator from Alabama

        Some more power to the people. The 17th amendment (1913) made the election of US Senators a direct question for the voting public. They had previously been called past state legislatures, a arrangement that became full of blackmail and extended vacancies.

        "The Senate of the U.s. shall exist composed of 2 Senators from each state, elected past the people thereof, for half-dozen years; and each Senator shall have ane vote."

        There would accept never been Prohibition (and all that came with it)

        The 18th amendment (1919), which would exist wiped out a little more than than a dozen years subsequently by the 21st subpoena (1933), set the stage for the great American alcohol ban. Prohibition, which began in 1920 and was repealed in 1933, was conceived of mostly as a response to saloon civilization, and the violence that followed, but ended up giving rise to a massive black market, and the mafia.

        A crowd in New York City celebrates the repeal of Eighteenth Amendment on December 5, 1933.

        How it began: "...the manufacture, auction, or transportation of intoxicating liquors inside, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the Usa and all territory field of study to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited."

        And how it ended: "The eighteenth commodity of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed."

        Women could not vote

        When Tennessee ratified the Nineteenth Amendment, Alice Paul, National Chairman of the Woman's Party, unfurled the ratification banner from Suffrage headquarters.

        The 19th amendment (1920) was ratified on Baronial xviii, 1920. Not even a hundred years ago. Its language is simple. The fight to guarantee the rights was long and roughshod. The Equal Rights Amendment, which would guarantee Constitutional rights utilise equally to everyone regardless of sex, was three states curt of ratification in 1982.

        "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall non be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex."

        Nosotros'd exist arguing over when to hold Inauguration Twenty-four hours every four years

        The 20th subpoena (1933) reads more like some constitutional housekeeping. Given the politics of today, though, it'southward an of import description. It sets out January 20 as the mean solar day one president gives way to the next and January 3 for the congressional switchover. (It likewise creates a succession protocol for when and if a president-elect dies before taking office.) There's a agglomeration more, but here's the affair you really discover:

        "The terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the twentieth twenty-four hour period of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the tertiary day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had non been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin."

        Obama could accept run against Trump in 2016

        President-elect Donald Trump and his wife Melania are greeted by President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle Obama upon arriving at the White House on Inauguration Day, January 20.

        If not for the 22nd amendment (1955) (nosotros already did the 21st!), one-time President Barack Obama might've had the chance to defend his office against Trump. Ratified in 1951, the amendment put term limits into identify for presidents -- meaning no more than than two terms in the White Firm, with a minor caveat that would have allowed, for instance, Lyndon Johnson to run again in 1968 if he so chose.

        "No person shall exist elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which another person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

        The people of Washington, D.C., would have fifty-fifty less representation in federal regime

        The 23rd subpoena (1961) gave the district its own presidential electors, every bit if it were a regular one-time country. They're still waiting on some Senators or members in the House (who can vote on actual legislation). Read the last office below. Really rubs it in.

        "The district constituting the seat of government of the United States shall engage, in such fashion as the Congress may direct, a number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the district would be entitled if it were a state..."

        People could exist legally compelled to pay for the right to vote

        A political cartoon about the elimination of the poll tax.

        The 24th subpoena (1964) is really a more expansive and of import protection than it might seem at a glance.

        It banned the "poll tax," which was initially created to -- look for information technology -- make it easier to vote. You didn't demand to own state, just be able to pay a modest tab. But that inverse over fourth dimension, every bit the poll tax was used equally an end-run on the 15th amendment to restrict the franchise -- specially downward south. The amendment is now likewise used to argue against efforts to create de facto expenses or taxes, like mandating voter ID and then charging people for the required document.

        Here'southward the text: "The right of citizens of the Us to vote in any principal or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the The states or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."

        We'd have to debate, without whatever real guidance, about the line of presidential succession

        Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963

        As this National Constitution Middle blog postal service explains, "Technically, the Constitution never spelled out how a Vice President would become President if a President died, resigned or was unable to perform the office'southward duty."

        Even weirder: The custom was established past John Tyler, who as vice president took over after the elected president, William Henry Harrison, died. He did it pretty much by claiming the office and then arguing his way past anyone who challenged him.

        The 25th amendment (1967), passed with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in mind, answered that question in more formal terms. It as well gives some vague instructions about how to boot a president who is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

        The of import part, for the time being: "In case of the removal of the President from part or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President."

        American soldiers in gainsay might not be able to vote

        Before July 1971, Americans old enough to exist drafted to fight in the Vietnam War were often besides young to vote in elections. The 26th amendment (1971) fixed that, lowering the age from 21 to 18 years former.

        "The right of citizens of the Us, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the The states or by any country on account of historic period."

        Congress could be voting itself a big ol' pay hike right at present, constructive immediately

          Only they aren't, and cannot, because of the 27th -- and last! for now! -- subpoena (1992). Ratified in 1992, it ways that House members would have to answer to the voters for any uptick in salary they might honor themselves.

          "No police varying the bounty for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take upshot until an ballot of Representatives shall accept intervened."

          delargiehatestaked.blogspot.com

          Source: https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/12/politics/constitutional-amendments-roy-moore/index.html

          0 Response to "what did roy moore say about the 17 amendments to the constitution"

          Post a Comment

          Iklan Atas Artikel

          Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

          Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

          Iklan Bawah Artikel